Michelle, I just read about your recent "Salute to Abortion" on your NetFlix show The Break with Michelle Wolf. I was mad at you for the way you trashed Sarah Huckabee Sanders at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, to which you could not have been invited had you not earned some significant recognition. The, eh, painful metaphors you used to describe the President's daughter Ivanka were even more objectionable. But you've redeemed yourself, baby, oh have you ever, by providing us a clean, clear and revealing window into the very soul of the "pro-choice" movement, yes you have!
I've always been especially disgusted by parades of pro choicers celebrating their present legal ability to scald or dismember unborn human beings, if not yet at will then ever closer to that as Hillary takes the oath. Yeah, celebrating! But OOOOPS!
Parades though, are seen by relatively limited audiences, yes? Not so NetFlix and your defining opus. For you have expressed, graphically, openly and honestly and to the limitless ether , the depraved essence of a movement which has revelled in the deaths of many tens of millions of unborn babies.
What's next? Will you sojourn at Auschwitz to rejoice in the slaughter of all those potential Israelis and to suggest that a renewal of that campaign is in order ? That would follow from the logic of the radical left, of which you are surely an eloquent and reckless spokeswoman.
And oh, those red, white and blue costumes; clever clever knock on the real America. And your timing, well now that couldn't be better. Senate Dems are working up to a real gutterwhumper over the President's insensitivity to the crying need in their lives for the aforementioned festivities. I mean, he had the nerve to nominate to the Supreme Court a man (that in itself an infamy ,by definition) who in following what every legal professional knows to be the entirety of the law, may find fault (FAULT!) in Roe v. Wade and the bacchanalia it periodically inspires. Gonna be a brawl. Then there are those midterm elections which loom ever larger through the summer miasma.
Thanks Michelle, for helping us to get our minds right on the paramount issue in both fights. After all, what evil are those who sleep better knowing thousands of feti have gone down the drain - of what further horror are they capable should their power be restored? Jack
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Ah, there's the rub: how will Kavanaugh vote on Roe v. Wade??? I opine that, if he votes to keep it in place, the religious right will be mighty disenchanted with President Trump. On the other hand, a vote on Roe may not percolate to the top of the judicial agenda until ANOTHER Justice has been replaced by Trump, in which case I'd say Roe's fate is sealed.
I should add: I castigate the "pro choice" movement because it tolerates in its membership and apparently assents to their spokesmanship for the movement, the kind of thugs I'm talking about above. I know there are people in the movement who are of good will and who recognize that abortion, like sending soldiers to their deaths in combat, is, some very few times, a horrid necessity for which there is no alternative and who believe, for honorable reasons, that it should be a woman's choice to make then. Some of the greatest American war leaders expressed their loathing for war. If some in the movement were as adamant in expressing their sorrow regret and reservation at facilitating this hideous act - if they were to publicly denounce and disown the "celebrators" - their movement would at least be considerable by civilized people. If any group were to feature Nazis or Commies openly holding forth, they would understandably be considered condemned by this association; that's why I made the reference to Auschwitz. I think Justice Kavanaugh would follow the law, of which informed commentary to the effect that Roe v. Wade was a badly argued and unjustly decided case, is an important part.
Post a Comment