Tuesday, April 10, 2018

Gun control

When prominent leftists use the term "gun control" they mean eventual disarming of all law abiding Americans. Their eyes glaze over and roll around  and they sneer when this opinion is expressed to them but one of their own is in the process of confirming it. Even if you reside in a state where the 2nd Amendment lives, best take notice; its what will happen when you elect Democrats at any level. Good old local Democrats have in the end to answer to Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer and their subordinates at all levels or they get shut out.

Because of a political deal made last week, our Governor in NY, Andrew Cuomo, who called gun rights advocates "just a vocal minority", may have won complete control of the NY state legislature.Five years ago he rammed the "NY Safe Act" through, by using a legislative maneuver reserved for measures the enactment of which is deemed immediately necessary.  It is filled with since proven  unworkable, unlawful and useless sanctions based on the assumption that severely limiting gun rights shows potential mass murderers the "light" (eg. background checks for ammo purchases, limit of seven rounds in ten round magazines, a ban on "scary" looking guns). "That's OK" said the truck using crowd killer in Manhattan a couple years ago, "I'll manage."    The Act included a handgun permit renewal requirement set five years in the future (that's immediately necessary?).  The law has been condemned by almost every county in common sense Upstate NY but we cannot out vote the political tumor at the mouth of the Hudson from which the Monumental Mouth, Cuomo ,draws his power.  Frankly, he's driving us crazy with this ill considered law which is virtually impossible  to administer or understand.  Its main purpose is, after all, the discouragement of gun ownership and if possible the exit from Cuomo's state of those (gun owners)"who don't belong in NY".    

After the deal was announced, Cuomo said "now we have the power to fight our common enemy". Now who might he mean by that?  President Trump, who has unforgiveably achieved what Andrew comically believes assured for him - the Presidency?  But gee, millions even in NY voted for Trump so he must mean them too.  Since all of Upstate NY disdains his "Safe Act" ( safe from trucks Andrew?) its reasonable to think they voted against totalitarian gun grabber Hillary and are on Andrew's s---list .  Oh, who knows?

But one thing is for sure, Andrew intends even tighter gun control enabled by his now perhaps dictatorial sway. That I expect after reading objective commentary, considering what I was told by a powerful legislator and common sense.  "Why, how foolish of you to think that we are after your guns and how unnecessary are the machinations of your NRA" pronounces Andrew and others of  his ilk like Charles Schumer. Such statements from them are deliberate falsehoods.  As soon as he has the power, Andrew hastens to take us one step closer to confiscation and in doing so gives us ample notice of what he truly wishes for: our guns on the junk pile and our lives under his thumb. Take heed America; Andrew is like a frantic child, he is hard put to restrain his impulses but he fairly predicts what prominent leftists like him intend for all of America.  Their vehicle is the Democrat party; so if you value your freedom, don't vote for Dems anywhere at any time.  Consider what is happening in NY and California and foresee your future if you trust them.  Jack      

2 comments:

Nicholas Waddy said...

Superb advice here: "don't vote for Dems anywhere at any time"! Nonetheless, I'd like to suggest that any New Yorker who would like to end the scourge that is Andrew Cuomo send a donation to Cynthia Nixon. Granted, she's if anything worse than him, but if she wins the nomination Republicans have a decent chance to take the governorship. That would be great to see.

Jack said...

Dr. Waddy: Her candidacy could provide a fascinating test of just how far left this state is. If Cuomo perceives in her a true threat to his nomination what does he do? Does he tell the truth that he is as far left as anyone might hope for, in order to preempt her honest and open radicalism? Does he portray himself as a moderate and ostensibly the sensible choice?. Does he publicly sniff "she's just a vocal minahritty"? Does he assume he'll be nominated and aim his nomination strategy at positioning himself to avoid being "Pataki'd" in November? Of course that would free him up for his epic journey to Washington. Even NY may be fed up with his histrionic ego though. But its like watching a hundred mile wide asteroid close in on earth. We are probably in for it.