If I were President Trump here is what I'd say. . .

What I'd love to have heard our courageous President say to that insolent little pot of a "reporter"who said to him "are you a racist" (notice, no question mark; it was a statement not a question) is this:  "Are you honest" (again no question mark needed).  Oh, where to begin on this business:

First, the word "racism" and its little sister "sexism" are completely discredited by misuse and overuse since the '60's.  They mean whatever the accuser means them to say.  That begs the question from the accused then "what do you mean by that term; how do you define it?" Most of the time that leaves the accuser gasping for air; they are used to using those terms as reflexive dialogue destroyers and as all purpose automatic condemnations ( "I speak in the name of the Inquisition") and they cannot endure having to explain the terms since they have never contemplated the possibility of having to do so.

The reporter was a soldier in the leftist onslaught on our President for his having reportedly said that we would be better off attracting immigrants from places like Norway rather than " ----holes" like Haiti or some African countries. Well!

I'm struck by oh so sensitive Democrat Senator Dick Durbin's remonstrances: words to the effect of " well yes I was present when the President uttered his, oh I can hardly stand to recall them,  oh, HATE filled comments, oh dear me where is my fainting couch?"  I cannot recall Senator Durbin's having publicly lamented the vicious HATE filled campaign his party has waged against our President for having the temerity to successfully oppose them in 2016. And Dick's sympathy for those who advocate the ultimate act of HATE - murder - of our police, says much too. 

And as for criticism of the President's crude language:  This from people who went to the wall in 1998 for the Clintonian couple one of whom is a probable forcible rapist and the other, their darling in 2016, for whom there are credible accounts of her malicious expectorations to the effect that "----ing Jews" cost her and her grotesque partner an earlier election. Besides the President's language is echoed in a million beer joints in the flyover country the Dems so disdain.  What, do Dems perceive that they have been bested in obscenity?  Awwww.

Haiti is a terribly beset entity replete with harrowing poverty ( and all of its appalling manifestations - repellant sights, smells and ever present oppression both from within and without the neighborhoods)  to the incalculable misery of those inextricably and irresistably enmired.  They are victimized not by the developed world but by those among them who exercise unbridled sociopathic power.  Positive education and devotion to a productive lifestyle is , in this setting, terribly difficult. By definition, such a society can produce few who may thrive in an advanced 21st century setting. And "deny, deny, deny, baby" like Slick Willy did but you won't change the reality that some African nations are awful places.

In contrast, a place like Norway, with a very well educated population with a longstanding democratic tradition is far more likely to produce immigrants who will benefit our nation. That is the priority our President has set  partly in reaction to the guilt ridden giveaways of  America blamers like Obama but also because he has brought unapologetic common sense back to his office.  Does that rule out humanitarian aid to places like Haiti?  Past massive efforts on our part  prove that that question need not even be asked.

The American left is completely lacking in moral authority to chide President Trump for this remark. Jack