Another insane outrage and due of course to the unconscionably easy access to guns enjoyed by homicidal Americans, yes? That this is a perception honestly held by many people of good will is understandable but they are misused and misrepresented by those at the heart of the "gun control" movement. Those cynics have as their goal the political discrediting of gun owners and their highly effective organizations (eg. NRA) as a key to destroying the entire conservative movement, which knows them for what they are - totalitarians. They think draconian gun control will discourage NRA and its supporters. Silly babies!
Lets imagine them their visions in realization. Lets actually ELIMINATE, say, two thirds of the estimated three hundred million plus firearms privately owned by constitutionally free and tyranny resistant Americans. Gee. I guess the availability of a mere one hundred million firearms sure will put the quietus to the madness now won't it? The monsters will have to resort to, well, powerful vehicles like trucks. But we already know that can't happen in places like Andrew Cuomo's "Safe" New York, now don't we?
That this kind of nonsense didn't frequent the 1950's, when gun ownership was not publicly described as mass sociopathy by then rightfully despised leftists, is blithely ignored by the gun banners isn't it? That is because it was before the beginning of time to them: 1964. It is therefore dismissable. What the really determined gun banners like Schumer, Cuomo , the Clintons and their avatars dread is attention to their very real and personal responsibility for mass violence in today's America through their relentless onslaught since the '60's on traditional values, the moral vacuum it has created and the subsequent license that affords to the criminally warped. They cannot risk close scrutiny of that reality so they disingenuously push measures they know cannot work as per their stated intention. They see yet another opportunity to do so now.Jack
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Well said, as always! I agree: the undermining of traditional values and the family is at the root of much of the violence in contemporary society. There is also no doubt that 50 or 100 years ago, access to guns was far easier, and one could take a gun anywhere, even in Europe, and yet rates of violent crime were much lower. I suspect you're right that the left knows that "banning" guns wouldn't have any impact on crime rates or incidents of mass murder, but they just can't help themselves. Any opportunity to criminalize something they consider icky must be seized!
Dr. Waddy: Thanx again. The left has never gotten over the wrong gunowners and the intolerably democratic and representative NRA did them in 1994, 2000 and 2016 (and along the way, with two monumental Supreme Court decisions). Not only were they insolently confronted with unforgiveable roadblocks to their unquestionably just progress toward a perfect world but the outrages were enacted by a group the coastal elite loaths - atavistically rural minded, freedom loving, gun owning, ridge running, hunting and wood cutting "mountain people" (and their avatars). The shame of this intensifies their essential vindictiveness. They cannot but hope that they can somehow take our freedom to thumb our noses at them and own firearms in our almost always lawful and responsible manner. Their chances of doing that are less than ever, I think, and it excites their frantic and vicious desperation.
Post a Comment